Gee, J. (2005). Learning by Design: good video games as learning machines
This article was retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5
This article claims that game designers make games engaging through incorporating principles of learning that are often not found in schools and it argues that these principles should be integrated but first school needs to change.
The author made this argument by stating the learning principle and explaining how it is beneficial in the learning process. He then described how this principle is found in games and how it makes the game more engaging. After describing how it appears in games, examples were provided of specific games that did a good job in incorporating this principle. The last thing he did was state whether or not this principle could be found in schools and how it could be integrated. Some detail was provided in how the integration of this principle would benefit the students as well as what the lack of this principle entails for the learning experience.There were thirteen principles split up under the headings of “Empowered Learners”, “Problem Solving” and “Understanding”. Under the heading of “Empowered Learners” the principles co-design, customize, identity, and manipulation and distributed knowledge were explored. Under “Problem Solving” was well-ordered problems, pleasantly frustrating, cycles of expertise, information “on demand” and “just in time”, fish tanks, sandboxes, and skills as strategies. Lastly, under “Understanding” was system thinking and meaning as action image.
This compares to the article Playing Video Games: Learning and Information Literacy because both stated that learning in video games is often an unconscious process. It also compares well to Games People Play: How Video Games Improve Probabilistic Learning because it is argued that video games are useful tools in the learning process.
There were no keywords listed for this article. Some useful articles that were listed were:
Comments
Post a Comment