Rice (2007) Assessing higher order thinking in video games



The purpose of this article is to identify games that are beneficial for the classroom in terms of its educational benefits.

The beginning of the article is about the lower level learning that takes place in edutainment (games meant for education) products. It examines what learning takes place and what is is not covered by games. The characteristics of highly cognitive virtual interactive environments are identified through examining these types of games. In order to help teachers as well as preservice teachers evaluate the games that they might consider using in their classrooms a rubric as well as an index are provided. These will help them to find how well the game encourages higher order thinking and thus determine how useful it would be in the classroom. At the end of the article an example is given of a social studies simulation that was designed to encourage higher order thinking and this game was evaluated.

This compares to the articles Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines and Games People Play: How Video Games Improve Probabilistic Learning as these also analyze how learning takes place in games and what type of learning this is.

The keywords for this article are: Cognition, computer-based training, education, Educational Technology, eLearning, Human Computer Interaction, human-computer interaction, Inclusive Education, Integration, interactive learning, K-12, pre-service teacher education, Preservice Teacher Education, Professional Development, simulation, teacher education, teacher preparation, teacher training, teaching, Teaching Methods, technology, technology integration, video games, Virtual Environments, virtual reality

Some useful articles were:

Alberto, P.A., & Troutman, A.C. (2003). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.


Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.


Gee, J.P. (2003b). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrace Macmillan.


Gibson, J.J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.


Gredler, M.E. (2002). Games and simulations and their relationship to learning. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 571-581). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaulm.


Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2003). Harnessing the power of games in education. INSIGHT, 3 (1), 5-34.


Some questions I have after reading this article are:

Do all educational games qualify as an edutainment product?

What is higher-order thinking?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dillion, J. (2015). Gamers, Community, and Charity

This is an interview with Jamie Dillion, a member of the child's play charity, a charity that acquires video game hardware and software for kids in need. This interview comes from a larger book called Thinking About Video Games: Interviews with the Experts by Heineman. This interview fails to answer any questions or prove anything other than gamers can do good things if they really feel like it and that videogame equipment such as the kinect can help to rehabilitate physical therapy patients. There is no methodology for this piece since no scientific research took place nor any kind of data collection “Technology associated with video games is becoming more useful in a large number of ways. For example, the Microsoft Kinect is now being used to help stroke victims regain movement” (Opening of interview). This article may be helpful for showing how games have gone beyond the basement dwelling stigma associated with them from the past and are now helping real world people. I
Read more

Gee. 2005. Learning by Design: good video games as learning machines

This article claims that game designers make games engaging through incorporating principles of learning that are often not found in schools and it argues that these principles should be integrated but first school needs to change. The author made this argument by stating the learning principle and explaining how it is beneficial in the learning process. He then described how this principle is found in games and how it makes the game more engaging. After describing how it appears in games, examples were provided of specific games that did a good job in incorporating this principle. The last thing he did was state whether or not this principle could be found in schools and how it could be integrated. Some detail was provided in how the integration of this principle would benefit the students as well as what the lack of this principle entails for the learning experience.There were thirteen principles split up under the headings of “Empowered Learners”, “Problem Solving” and “Understandin
Read more

Przybylski, A., & Weinstein, N. (2019). Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report

Andrew Przybylski and Netta Weinsteins’ study shows that violent video games have a null effect on aggressive behavior in adolescents. The study was done in 2019 and was authorized by University of Oxford. Although Przyblski and Weinstein initially predicted that adolescents who played violent video games would be more aggressive. The data collected from the psychological form used showed that aggression increases were null. “Despite the null findings identified in the present study, history gives us reason to suspect the idea that violent video games drives aggressive behaviour will remain an unsettled question for parents, pundits and policy-makers. Although our results do have implications for these stakeholders, the present work holds special significance for those studying technology effects, in general, and video games, in particular.” (Conclusion). This study used 1000 adolescents (500 male and 500 female) as the study group. This group would then play video games that ei
Read more