Kafai & Burke (2015) Constructionist gaming: Understanding the benefits of making games for learning



The purpose of this article is to determine the educational benefits of allowing children to design games.

The article begins by synthesizing fifty-five studies regarding making games and learning. Through this synthesis it was found that most of these studies focused on using game making to teach coding and academic content but there were few studies regarding collaboration and identity in game making. The article then argues for the use of games for collaboration and identity. Making games helps to connect students to each other. It also brings up the issues of diversity and access.

This doesn’t really relate much to the other articles because it’s about game making and not about game playing although there are some connections to the article Design of Educational Multiplayer Videogames: A Vision from Collaborative Learning because they both advocate for the enhancement of collaboration through games.

The keywords for this article are: constructionist gaming, personal dimensions, social dimensions, cultural dimensions, connected gaming

Some useful articles were:

Abelson, H. & DiSessa, A. (1980). Turtle geometry: The computer as a medium for exploring mathematics. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.


Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/∼kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf


Cassell, J. & Jenkins, H. (1998). (Eds.). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.


Gee, J. P. (2008). “Learning and games.” In K. Salen (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning (pp. 21–40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Girard, C., Ecalle, J., & Magant, A. (2012). Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 1–13.


Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42, 38–43.


Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P., … Robinson, R. (2009). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Chicago, IL: John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.


Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century (White Paper). Chicago, IL: John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.


Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.


Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games & Culture, 1, 36–40.


Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.


Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J. J., & Nao, K. (2008). Stuck in the shallow end. Education, race, and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionsim. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–12). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.


Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York, NY: Norton.


Provenzo, E. J. (1991). Video kids: Making sense of Nintendo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.


Shaffer, D. (2007). How computer games help children learn. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.


Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.


Taylor, R. P. (1980). The computer in schools: Tutors, tools, tutees. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.


Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1991). Epistemological pluralism: Styles and voices within the computer culture. Signs, 16, 128–157.


Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2013). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 229–243.


Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of the equity in access, use and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34, 179–225.


Williams, L., & Kessler, R. (2002). Pair programming illuminated. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.


Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.


Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., von Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 249–265.


Young, M. F., Slota, S., Cutter, A. R., Jalette, G., Mullin, G., Lai, B., … Yukhymenko, M. (2012). Our princess is another castle: A review of trends in serious gaming for education. Review of Educational Research, 82, 61–89.

Some questions I have after reading this article are:

What classes would game making be useful for?

Is game making more beneficial than game playing?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dillion, J. (2015). Gamers, Community, and Charity

This is an interview with Jamie Dillion, a member of the child's play charity, a charity that acquires video game hardware and software for kids in need. This interview comes from a larger book called Thinking About Video Games: Interviews with the Experts by Heineman. This interview fails to answer any questions or prove anything other than gamers can do good things if they really feel like it and that videogame equipment such as the kinect can help to rehabilitate physical therapy patients. There is no methodology for this piece since no scientific research took place nor any kind of data collection “Technology associated with video games is becoming more useful in a large number of ways. For example, the Microsoft Kinect is now being used to help stroke victims regain movement” (Opening of interview). This article may be helpful for showing how games have gone beyond the basement dwelling stigma associated with them from the past and are now helping real world people. I
Read more

Gee. 2005. Learning by Design: good video games as learning machines

This article claims that game designers make games engaging through incorporating principles of learning that are often not found in schools and it argues that these principles should be integrated but first school needs to change. The author made this argument by stating the learning principle and explaining how it is beneficial in the learning process. He then described how this principle is found in games and how it makes the game more engaging. After describing how it appears in games, examples were provided of specific games that did a good job in incorporating this principle. The last thing he did was state whether or not this principle could be found in schools and how it could be integrated. Some detail was provided in how the integration of this principle would benefit the students as well as what the lack of this principle entails for the learning experience.There were thirteen principles split up under the headings of “Empowered Learners”, “Problem Solving” and “Understandin
Read more

Przybylski, A., & Weinstein, N. (2019). Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report

Andrew Przybylski and Netta Weinsteins’ study shows that violent video games have a null effect on aggressive behavior in adolescents. The study was done in 2019 and was authorized by University of Oxford. Although Przyblski and Weinstein initially predicted that adolescents who played violent video games would be more aggressive. The data collected from the psychological form used showed that aggression increases were null. “Despite the null findings identified in the present study, history gives us reason to suspect the idea that violent video games drives aggressive behaviour will remain an unsettled question for parents, pundits and policy-makers. Although our results do have implications for these stakeholders, the present work holds special significance for those studying technology effects, in general, and video games, in particular.” (Conclusion). This study used 1000 adolescents (500 male and 500 female) as the study group. This group would then play video games that ei
Read more