Gross (2007), Digital Games in Education




The purpose of this article was to analyze the gender differences in games and the ways in which popular games can be beneficial in an educational setting.

The author divided this article into five parts in which the relevance of the research was introduced, how video games have changed over time, research on video games in education, approaches that could be used to introduce video games into education, and the problems that might arise in this introduction. It was stated that some games that take place in different eras in history can be useful as they contain information about the time period. The research was not only on computer games but much of what was found applies to computer games. There was little research on video games until the late 1990s. Many viewed video games negatively and it was not considered that they could be used in education. The main increase in research was on the structural aspects of games and the integration of games into schools. Over time many thought that learning occurred when there were opportunities to practice skills. People also realized that people have different backgrounds and so learn in different ways. The gender disparity was analyzed in which boys play more games than girls and the games oriented towards girls are more focused on reality than those played by boys. Although this difference is present both boys and girls were recorded to be confident in operating computers. When implementing video games into schools popular games were used rather than games that are designed for education. Activities started with playing the game and then discussing the game using topics that were previously prepared by the teacher. Some problems faced were that teachers don’t want to use games in their classrooms as they take too much time to effectively integrate and don’t address topics in their entirety. It is also difficult for teachers as there is a lack of confidence for those that are not familiar with video games.

This compares to other materials I’ve read as it focuses on using games in education but it is different in that it promotes the use of popular games rather than those designed for academic purposes.

The keywords for this article are: digital games, game-based learning, instructional design, and videogames.

Some useful articles were:

Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2005). Beyond edutaiment. Unpublished dissertation, University of Copenhagen. Copenhagen, Denmark.

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: PalGrave-McMillan.

Loftus, G., & Loftus, E. (1983). Mind at play: The psychology of video games. New York: Basic Books.

McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A., & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educational use of games.

McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of Man. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game based learning, New York: McGraw Hill Press.

Roberts, D. F., Foehr, D. G., Rideout, V. I., & Brodie, M. (1999). Kids and media at the new millennium: A comprehensive national analysis of children’s media use. Menlo Park, CA: A Kaiser Family Foundation Report.
Some questions I have after reading this article are:
Is it more beneficial for students to play popular games rather than scholarly games?
How can video games be effectively incorporated into a classroom?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dillion, J. (2015). Gamers, Community, and Charity

This is an interview with Jamie Dillion, a member of the child's play charity, a charity that acquires video game hardware and software for kids in need. This interview comes from a larger book called Thinking About Video Games: Interviews with the Experts by Heineman. This interview fails to answer any questions or prove anything other than gamers can do good things if they really feel like it and that videogame equipment such as the kinect can help to rehabilitate physical therapy patients. There is no methodology for this piece since no scientific research took place nor any kind of data collection “Technology associated with video games is becoming more useful in a large number of ways. For example, the Microsoft Kinect is now being used to help stroke victims regain movement” (Opening of interview). This article may be helpful for showing how games have gone beyond the basement dwelling stigma associated with them from the past and are now helping real world people. I
Read more

Gee. 2005. Learning by Design: good video games as learning machines

This article claims that game designers make games engaging through incorporating principles of learning that are often not found in schools and it argues that these principles should be integrated but first school needs to change. The author made this argument by stating the learning principle and explaining how it is beneficial in the learning process. He then described how this principle is found in games and how it makes the game more engaging. After describing how it appears in games, examples were provided of specific games that did a good job in incorporating this principle. The last thing he did was state whether or not this principle could be found in schools and how it could be integrated. Some detail was provided in how the integration of this principle would benefit the students as well as what the lack of this principle entails for the learning experience.There were thirteen principles split up under the headings of “Empowered Learners”, “Problem Solving” and “Understandin
Read more

Przybylski, A., & Weinstein, N. (2019). Violent video game engagement is not associated with adolescents' aggressive behaviour: evidence from a registered report

Andrew Przybylski and Netta Weinsteins’ study shows that violent video games have a null effect on aggressive behavior in adolescents. The study was done in 2019 and was authorized by University of Oxford. Although Przyblski and Weinstein initially predicted that adolescents who played violent video games would be more aggressive. The data collected from the psychological form used showed that aggression increases were null. “Despite the null findings identified in the present study, history gives us reason to suspect the idea that violent video games drives aggressive behaviour will remain an unsettled question for parents, pundits and policy-makers. Although our results do have implications for these stakeholders, the present work holds special significance for those studying technology effects, in general, and video games, in particular.” (Conclusion). This study used 1000 adolescents (500 male and 500 female) as the study group. This group would then play video games that ei
Read more